(no subject)

[keelywolfe]

My son was walking around earlier today in a t-shirt and his underwear and I finally griped at him to put on pants because it was bugging me. And I realized that it wasn't just because our house is cold this morning. There is something just not right, in my head, about wearing a t-shirt with no pants. Not that subtracting the underwear would make it better or anything but it's just not right in the Major Clothing Order of Things.

Man + underpants - t-shirt - jeans - socks = OK

Man + underpants + jeans - t-shirt - socks = OK

Man + underpants + t-shirt - jeans - socks = Kind of weird

Man + underpants + socks - jeans - t-shirt = ALERT! ALERT!! VISUAL SHUTDOWN IN PROGRESS!!


I'm not entirely sure why, but this is the way the math works in my head. I never was good at math.... ;)

Comments

[starfish422.livejournal.com]

Heh. Here's one:

Man (+ jeans - underwear - socks - shirt) - button - zipper + view of treasure trail = KABOOM.

:)
xoxo Katie

[keelywolfe.livejournal.com]

ROFL!

Now that is an algebraic formula that I can get behind. *G*

[bluetaelon.livejournal.com]

You have way to much free time lol:)

[mmouse15.livejournal.com]

I think it's because when the boys don't have pants on, their hands are perpetually at their crotches, playing with their bits. Or at least, that's my experience and why I'm always asking them to put on pants.

[keelywolfe.livejournal.com]

...yes. Yes, now that I think about it, I believe this is the problem and unless the person is Johnny Depp, I really just don't need to see that at 7am.

So yes. Pants. Pants are good.

[imitari.livejournal.com]

Suddenly, I love math. I think we need icons.